Lost files anyone? | Blogotariat

I was mulling over a directory
on a server the other day, trying to make heads or tails out of where I should
put stuff. The directory was completely shambolic and the file I was compiling
could have been put in several locations, any of which could have been argued
to be relevant and ‘logical’. What happens in organisations is that these
directories seem to grow by iterations which are often based on the desires of
some of the people using them. These desires are often transient, and with
that, will change over time. As a consequence, you can end up with a shambolic
directory structure like that I encountered today, about as organised as putting
all the files in a 44-gallon drum.

As anyone who comes
along later will tell you, trying to find things in such a shambolic system can
be soul-destroying; as difficult as trying to find empathy among a bunch of
conservatives. If you have ever spent a relatively large amount of time
attempting to find a particular file among a drum of other files, then you will
understand the reason it is worth having a sensible hierarchical directory
structure1.

The two end-members of
such a hierarchical structure include at one end, having all your files in one
directory, while at the other end having each file in its own directory. Each
of these is probably equally ridiculous. You need the right balance between
breadth and depth, such that each item can logically only go in one place. That
means you need to avoid overlapping categories. For instance, ‘Photos’ might
have subfolders of ‘Fred’ for photographs of Fred, and ‘Charlie’ for
photographs of Charlie. What do you do if you have a photograph of both Fred
and Charlie? This indicates that your file structure has a problem. You also
need to avoid letting your folders get too big. If you have the folder ‘Photos’,
it is not sensible to have 20,000 images in that directory alone2.

Short of having duplicates
in the Charlie folder and the Fred folder for photos containing both Charlie and
Fred, you should have a system which allows you to find files the properties of
which you know, yet the name of which you have forgotten. That system exists
and it is a system which allows you to add ‘tags’ to a file. These tags act
like keywords and are searchable. In the case of the photo showing both Fred
and Charlie, you can add those names as tags to the file, separating them by a
semicolon3. I must go back to the people who set up this directory
system and berate them for their lack of foresight! Either that, or fix it for
them.

Sources

The post Lost files anyone? appeared first on THE BLOT REPORT.