Is this what passes as commentary from one of Australians most well known conservatives. You gotta admire someone with so few morals that he immediately jumps on the story of a dead baby and tries to use it to bash AGW believers, but according to Bolt it is a "metaphor".

Utterly tragic, but in some ways a grim metaphor:

Homicide Detective Senior Sergeant Ron Iddles said: “Sadly, about 5.30, a gentleman living on a rural property went out to put out his rubbish bins, went to a bus shelter and found a green shopping bag, looked in the bag and found the body of an infant or a baby, aged somewhere between one or two weeks and three months old.”

In the hysteria to “save” Earth from a warming that’s actually halted, we ignore a true and growing threat to children.

Lets ignore that green bags have nothing to do with global warming, but are more about protecting small animals. I guess they can be thrown in the same evil "environment" umbrella. But how does Andrew suppose that AGW has caused us to disregard childrens welfare? Societies are capable of multitasking, we can do more than one thing. It isnt a case of "yep we are concentrating on this AGW thing, so dont bother reporting child abuse anymore, oh and we we taking funding out of DOCS and into the department of climate change".

It is such a weak argument it could even be used against Bolt's favourite causes.

"In the hysteria to save children from Bill Henson photographs, we ignore the real threat of child abuse"

"In the hysteria to save Iraq from Al-Queda, we ignore the real threat from child killers in Australia"

Both are equally retarded arguments, but just as valid as Andrews. But you cant beat an idiot with logic, you have to go down to their level. So i have issued the cosmicjester Andrew Bolt challenge.

Clocks ticking Andrew.

Oh and Andrew, you really are a cunt.